...?
In Western Europe and North America, a scenario has long been contemplated in which the Russian Army, after its victory in Ukraine, continues to march forward – next seeking to conquer the Baltic republics and Poland.
The purpose of this simple propaganda ... ...
It is telling that almost no one in the EU dares to publicly ask whether Moscow is interested in a direct armed conflict with NATO. What would its aims be in such a war? And what price would it be willing to pay? Obviously, even posing such questions could ...
... Ukraine conflict offers several strategic advantages. First, it reinforces US leadership within NATO and demonstrates its military capabilities. Second, the conflict creates a lucrative market for American arms manufacturers, who supply weapons to both Ukraine and NATO allies worried about Russian aggression. This military-industrial complex plays a significant role in US foreign policy, as arms sales contribute substantially to the American economy.
Moreover, a prolonged conflict weakens Russia, a major geopolitical ...
... significant involvement of individual units of communications, engineering troops, and air defense system crews, although their presence on the frontline may be avoided. A more extreme scenario would be the deployment of contingents from individual NATO countries along the borders of Ukraine and Belarus to facilitate the transfer of Ukrainian forces to the east. Finally, a more radical option would be the deployment of NATO military forces on the frontlines, which could be seen as an unacceptable action by the Alliance.
Any of these ...
... Ukrainians sent into the grinder.
This conflict will drag on to the American elections where if former President Donald Trump is elected, the conflict will be settled where Ukraine loses territory in creating a buffer zone and will not be permitted to join NATO. If Biden is re-elected, the war potentially spirals on with Ukraine all but decimated.
Zhao Huaheng:
A Dangerous Gamble: The Russia-American Nuclear Game in the Ukraine Crisis
Meanwhile, the West’s sanctions have left the Russian economy stronger than before the war with China and India now the largest recipients ...
... more than two years, and it resulted in signing of several important joint documents.
Among them is the Declaration on International Relations Entering a New Era. The declaration adopted against the background of the escalation of the situation over Ukraine demonstrated the convergence of the positions of the two states on a number of important issues. In particular, it emphasizes the negative attitude towards NATO expansion and destabilizing activities of external forces in the regions of the common neighborhood
[1]
. Equally important were two important economic agreements signed at the same time. One of them envisioned the sale of 100 million tons of Russian ...
... and MGIMO University Professor, noted that NATO was currently at a crossroads, with little clarity on how to organize the anniversary summit in Washington, D.C. or how NATO’s strategy, recently adopted as a strategic concept, should be formalized. NATO says Ukraine is inching closer to joining the alliance. However, the more the front line is being pushed, the farther Ukraine is from the bloc. The expert spoke about two issues that topped the agenda of the latest ministerial: 1) NATO’s line of action amid ...
... capitals, that were not interested in a diplomatic deal, prevented this from happening. The Westerners did everything to deprive Ukraine of its independence and turn it into an anti-Russian bridgehead.
But Russia still doesn’t forgo the dialogue. We are ... ... understanding Russia's key demands - the denazification and demilitarization of Ukrainian thugs as well as rejection of Russophobia and NATO plans of Kiev - Washington and its satellites are only making things worse. They funnel weapons to their puppets, calling ...
... other plans – they intensified their suppression of the ethnic Russian and Russian-speaking population, implicitly preparing Ukraine for a war against Russia. The climax was reached in 2021, when the West began pumping our neighbouring country with weapons.... ... intervened, and the so-called “Bucha massacre” was presented as alleged evidence of “atrocities” of the Russian army.
Nato then prolonged the confrontation by supplying Kyiv with weapons. Nato members see this conflict as a good investment for ...
... military personnel and additional Soviet-era BMP infantry fighting vehicles.[1] Greek Defence Minister Nikos Panagiotopoulos said: ‘We will provide every support to Ukraine at this very important, crucial stage of the war, and will continue to support Ukraine for as long as it takes — that’s a very clear position that we have taken from the outset.’ By ‘we’, he certainly does not represent the Greek people, but rather a NATO quisling government.
As the Kiev US-instructed leadership continues to lose soldiers and equipment on a massive scale, one can legitimately ask what is the point of continuing any support, other than strictly humanitarian, for Ukraine. Ukraine is ...
... that we heard at the beginning of the armed conflict in Ukraine came from the West. On the Russian side, at the expert and unofficial political level, there was talks about the possibility of nuclear weapons strikes against targets on the territory of NATO countries, not Ukraine. Such strikes, as it was discussed, could be inflicted on airfields based on modern Western aircraft transferred to Ukraine, on logistics hubs and [military] facilities.
Elena Karnaukhova: The USSR and the PRC entered into a border armed conflict ...
