Analytical articles
Statement by the Euro-Atlantic Security Leadership Group (EASLG)
ShortWhat will we lose on February 6, 2021, if the United States does not try to meet Russia halfway?
ShortIran and the Arab states of the Gulf would gain from taking control over their security interests
ShortStrong intellectual property rights could facilitate the move towards sustainable development
ShortFor the United States, for the European Union, for Russia, for China and for many other leading players in world politics, the great turning point, most likely, will not be in 2020, but in 2024
ShortTwo former diplomats, from Russia and America, call for extending the nuclear arms limitation pact called New START, to make the world more secure
ShortThe risk of sanctions will persist regardless of success in resolving the trade war
ShortOn February 3, 2020, Andrey Kortunov, RIAC Director General, gave a public lecture at University Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne on the topic “Trump's Lessons for Russia.”
ShortThe way things will develop for the Nord Stream 2 will be partly determined by the unfoldment of the debates over the greater European strategic autonomy from the US
ShortDespite the public relations spin on events, little has altered since the assassination of Greece’s first pro-Russian leader, Count Kapodistrias
ShortThe more frequently the U.S. launches SWIFT-linked sanctions, the harder other countries will work on developing alternatives
ShortPoll conducted
-
In your opinion, what are the US long-term goals for Russia?
U.S. wants to establish partnership relations with Russia on condition that it meets the U.S. requirements 33 (31%) U.S. wants to deter Russia’s military and political activity 30 (28%) U.S. wants to dissolve Russia 24 (22%) U.S. wants to establish alliance relations with Russia under the US conditions to rival China 21 (19%)
Leonid Leonid Grigoryev, Adrian Pabst
Andrey Melville, Alexey Barabashev, Alexander Obolonsky, Riccardo Mario Cucciolla