.... Adopting this logic, the fading global liberal order (GLO) may be defined similarly; it is neither global, nor liberal, nor orderly. The GLO is not global, as it protects the interests of the few by assisting in the rise of a hegemony and unipolar world order. The order exploits weak but resource-rich nations by colonizing them, providing certain states with opportunities to impose an ideology and values on others. It is not liberal, as it does not allow weak countries to choose their own paths ...
... activities engaging BRICS parliaments, universities and think tanks, civil society institutions and public movements of all kinds.
Timofey Bordachev:
BRICS Before the Kazan Summit: The Dialectic of Creation and Destruction Against the Backdrop of a New World Order
The fundamental challenge for BRICS summits is to gradually shift the focus from rather general political statements to specific proposals and solutions that reflect the fundamental interests of developing nations, which have long been underrepresented ...
... position of a narrow group of states, will be reduced to a minimum.
In these conditions, the international community and especially its leading states are constantly faced with the problem of choosing between two forms of interaction with the outgoing world order: destruction and creation. Both of these forms are in dialectical interaction with each other and it would be strange to think that there is an opportunity to pave a clear and simple path to a new, more just global order. Moreover, the opponents ...
... interaction with the ASEAN states.
Xu Changzhi
The report is in line with the highly changing global context and accurately reflects how Russian and Chinese experts view the new realities and prospects for Russian-Chinese co-operation in building a new world order.
We pay much attention to BRICS and the upcoming summit in Kazan, which is a very important international event at a time of geopolitical instability. China supports Russia's efforts during its chairmanship. BRICS has moved to a new stage ...
... international relations—multipolarity. [
1
] Contributing to the spirit of hope for a fair world, free of injustice and imperialism, the time is ripe for a new world—a multipolar world.
A Modus Vivendi Born Out of Dissatisfaction
Aleksandr Dynkin:
World Order Transformation: Economy, Ideology, Technology
A single wheel would not move the entire system of international relations, nor would unipolarity. Hence the urgent need for a multipolar world order [
2
] as a modus vivendi, which is fortifying ...
... constitutes an important basis for Sino-Russian international cooperation, while at the same time, the two countries have their own characteristics in interpreting the concepts, applying the policies and choosing the paths.
Multipolarity
Aleksandr Dynkin:
World Order Transformation: Economy, Ideology, Technology
Multipolarity was the starting point of the Russian-Chinese consensus on international cooperation, i.e., the opposition to the unipolar structure of the world and the advocacy of a multipolar ...
It would be unrealistic to expect that the future world order will be free of conflict. The world will retain its diversity, with different potentials of countries and their competition
The concept of a
multipolar (or polycentric) world order
[
1
] was first coined by Academician Yevgeny Primakov ...
... approach to US Western allies and partners: both groups of nations appear to be not full-fledged sovereign decision-makers, but rather as disciplined decision-takers with somewhat limited sovereignty. This is not a very appealing vision of the future world order for aspiring nations in the Global South trying to position themselves not as speechless objects, but as vocal subjects of global politics. To cut it short, what works for the time being in Europe or in the Northeast Asia, does not work the ...
... the crisis in Ukraine
The “confrontation” between the global majority and the “collective West”
The role and impact of sanctions and the consequences of Russian asset expropriation.
Fyodor Lukyanov:
‘Being in Order’ Also Means Being in the World Order
Oleg Yanovsky:
Hello and welcome to the Grani project with Oleg Yanovsky. With us today is a very special guest, Ivan Nikolaevich Timofeev, Director General of the Russian International Affairs Council. I’d like to start off by asking a ...
Policy Brief #51 / 2024
Policy Brief #51 / 2024
The Russian-Chinese “comprehensive partnership and strategic interaction of the new era” represent a key element of the emerging multipolar world order. Moscow and Beijing’s mutual support in the international arena, growing trade turnover in the face of sanctions, strengthening humanitarian ties, and people-to-people cooperation represent a unique example of the constructive dialogue taking ...
