RIAC :: USA,ABM Treaty,New START,Strategic stability

Search: USA,ABM Treaty,New START,Strategic stability (2 materials)

The Post-INF Treaty world: Cutting Сosts and Reducing Risks

... the resumption of the talks as simple as possible Amidst accusations of non-compliance towards Russia, on 20 October 2018 US ... ... terms of the treaty, as was the case when it withdrew from the ABM Treaty in 2002. The Americans quit, but they did not create ... ... ‘domino effect’: if it abandons the INF Treaty, it puts the New START treaty’s extension into question. Mutual accusations ... ... the absence of an adequate international legal foundation for strategic stability, this stability can and should be improved ...

22.10.2019

analytics

Nuclear Catastrophe: Myth or Reality?

... United States — the two countries, which are responsible to a great extent for the strategic stability in the world — are not conducting any negotiations on the issue... ... agreements on the most complex and sensitive issues. The 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (ABM Treaty ) and the 1974 Protocol to the ABM Treaty, the Strategic Arms Limitation... ... Yes, the Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty was signed in Moscow in 2002, and the New START was signed in 2010. And both these documents are, without a doubt, very important...

01.02.2019

interview

Poll conducted

In your opinion, what are the US long-term goals for Russia?

U.S. wants to establish partnership relations with Russia on condition that it meets the U.S. requirements	33 (31%)
U.S. wants to deter Russia’s military and political activity	30 (28%)
U.S. wants to dissolve Russia	24 (22%)
U.S. wants to establish alliance relations with Russia under the US conditions to rival China	21 (19%)