Your preferred candidate? None!

... “Against all” was abolished, civil campaign for boycott of 2011 Duma elections called for crossing of ballots as a sign of disagreement not only with all candidates, but also with the system itself. [5] What does international practice show? “None of the above” is not a common praxis and you would hardly look for parallels between countries that are using it. Countries like India, Greece, Ukraine (recently abolished in 2012), Columbia, Bangladesh, Nevada (U.S. state) offer(ed) this choice on their ballots, however they differ widely in the legal proceedings after the election. A proceeding after the elections is, in my opinion, the most ...