.... Israel, likewise, possesses advanced capabilities unmatched in its immediate region. Yet modern conflicts increasingly demonstrate a sobering reality: battlefield dominance does not automatically translate into strategic success.
The recent war in Gaza and rising tensions between Washington and Tehran illustrate the widening gap between tactical achievements and long-term political outcomes. They also raise deeper questions about international law, global legitimacy, and the fragility of an already ...
... positions will automatically become part of regional orders. Moreover, the prospect of their continued presence on the political map is sometimes the subject of heated debate.
One can ridicule the agreement recently signed in Egypt to end the war in the Gaza Strip: it hardly at all looks like a long-term solution to the most complex problem in the Middle East. Moreover, it fits perfectly with the American government’s strategy of creating “achievements” whose real value cannot stand the test of ...
... there is vulnerability at the level of strategic depth, it is necessary to rely on a striking deterrent force that preserves Israel’s continuity. However, as a result of the strategic victories of the resistance axis in the July 2006 war, through the Gaza wars (2008-2021) and the global war on Syria (2011-2019), there have become radical changes that entail threats that will have very serious repercussions on the level of the fate and existence of the Israeli occupying state.
In this context, the ...
Thus far, both parties are interested in war rather than peace
The Israel–Hamas conflict threatens to escalate into a new war that could surpass anything seen during the previous operations in the Gaza Strip in terms of the amount of bloodshed. Tensions have been mounting for the last three months. The new spiral of the conflict started with mass protests on the Gaza–Israel border with attempts to burst through the fence. Palestinian authorities ...
