Print
Rate this article
(no votes)
 (0 votes)
Share this article
Sergey Luzyanin

Director of RAS Institute for Far Eastern Studies, RIAC member

Zhao Huasheng

Professor and director of the Center for Russia and Central Asia Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai

This report presents the results of analytical monitoring performed by leading Russian and Chinese experts on the key processes in Russian-Chinese relations in 2013–2014. They analyzed the strategic format of interaction between the two countries in the international arena and their relations in the fields of trade, investment (interbank), energy (hydrocarbons), transport, educational, scientific, and cultural areas. They considered the available resources and possibilities of enhancing the Russian-Chinese strategic partnership, as well as the difficulties and challenges they face in the modern day. The experts elaborate their conclusions, recommendations, and development scenarios for bilateral relations in future.

This report presents the results of analytical monitoring performed by leading Russian and Chinese experts on the key processes in Russian-Chinese relations in 2013–2014.

They analyzed the strategic format of interaction between the two countries in the international arena and their relations in the fields of trade, investment (interbank), energy (hydrocarbons), transport, educational, scientific, and cultural areas. They considered the available resources and possibilities of enhancing the Russian-Chinese strategic partnership, as well as the difficulties and challenges they face in the modern day. The experts elaborate their conclusions, recommendations, and development scenarios for bilateral relations in future.

The report has been produced by the Russian International Affairs Council, the RAS Institute of Far Eastern Studies, the Institute of International Studies, Fudan University.

Authors:

From Russia: S.G. Luzyanin, Dr. of History (Head); A.V. Kortunov, Ph.D. in History;
A.N. Karneev, Ph.D. in History; V.Y. Portyakov, Ph.D. in Political Science;
V.B. Kashin, Ph.D. in Political Science; V.A. Matveev, Ph.D. in Economics

From China: Zhao Huasheng, Professor (Head); Feng Yujun, Dr. of Law; Shi Ze, Ph.D. in History; Xing Guangcheng, Dr. of Law; Liu Huaqin, Ph.D. in Economics

Russian-Chinese Dialogue: The 2015 Model, 358 Kb

Rate this article
(no votes)
 (0 votes)
Share this article

Poll conducted

  1. Korean Peninsula Crisis Has no Military Solution. How Can It Be Solved?
    Demilitarization of the region based on Russia-China "Dual Freeze" proposal  
     36 (35%)
    Restoring multilateral negotiation process without any preliminary conditions  
     27 (26%)
    While the situation benefits Kim Jong-un's and Trump's domestic agenda, there will be no solution  
     22 (21%)
    Armed conflict still cannot be avoided  
     12 (12%)
    Stonger deterrence on behalf of the U.S. through modernization of military infrastructure in the region  
     4 (4%)
    Toughening economic sanctions against North Korea  
     2 (2%)
 
For business
For researchers
For students