... Rakhmangulov, Deputy Director of the Global Government Research Centre at the Higher School of Economics’ International Organisations Research Institute and RIAC expert, and Victoria Panova, PhD in History, and regional director for Russia in the G8/G20/BRICS research group at the University of Toronto. Do you think it’s possible, given the worsening economic and political situation, especially in the Euro-Atlantic region, that the Group of Twenty summit in Brisbane could mark a breakthrough? ...
Search: G20,BRICS (4 materials)
... The crisis proved that G8 was no longer an effective forum of global policy coordination and it is increasingly replaced by G20. Despite the ongoing redistribution of power, however, emerging countries particularly Russia and China are often portrayed ... ... Between States and Corporations? (New York: Portfolio, 2011).  The most powerful and dynamic emerging countries are called BRICs (Brazil, Russia, India, and China), first coined by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill. The BRICs Summit in 2011 ...
..., sustainable and predictable system of international reserve currencies, and with the finalization of the current stage in the reform of the International Monetary Fund within the deadlines and subject to the conditions that were agreed upon by the G20 and the IMF. An important initiative is to have a BRICS Bank of Development. It could evolve into a kind of analytical centre (similar to an investment bank) which would produce recommendations on key issues important to the member countries and their economies, defining the most advantageous areas of ...
... problems of the G8 agenda in the context of global challenges and interests of Russia as well as prospects for monetary arrangements between the countries of the BRICS. The report includes proposals for Russia’s membership strategy in G8, G20, and BRICS. G20, G8, BRICS development momentum and interests of Russia , PDF, 1.4 Mb
Korean Peninsula Crisis Has no Military Solution. How Can It Be Solved?
Demilitarization of the region based on Russia-China "Dual Freeze" proposal 36 (35%) Restoring multilateral negotiation process without any preliminary conditions 27 (26%) While the situation benefits Kim Jong-un's and Trump's domestic agenda, there will be no solution 22 (21%) Armed conflict still cannot be avoided 12 (12%) Stonger deterrence on behalf of the U.S. through modernization of military infrastructure in the region 4 (4%) Toughening economic sanctions against North Korea 2 (2%)