Aleksandr Dynkin

Share

President of the IMEMO, RAS Full Member, Chairman of the RIAC Scientific Council. RIAC Member.

Graduated from the Moscow Aviation Institute (MAI).

Worked at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the USSR Academy of Sciences; travelled a career path from junior researcher to director of the Institute.

Was Chair of the Faculty of Economics at Moscow International University.

Served as counselor on economics to the Minister of Science and High Technology of Russia and as counselor on economics to the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation.

Member of scientific councils at the Russian Federation (RF) Ministry of Foreign Affairs and RF Security Council. Member of the Presidential Council on Science, Technology and Education. Member of the Board of Trustees of the Institute of Contemporary Development. Member on the Council on Grants of the Russian Government.

Member of the management committee of the New Economic Association.

Member of the editorial boards of several journals: World Economy and International Relations, The Strategy of Russia, Vestnik MGIMO-University,, Economic Policy, New Economic Association Journal.

Has authored many academic papers and publications.

Academic focus: problems of economic growth and forecasting, energy development, comparative international analysis and laws of innovation-focused development.

Recipient of titles and awards.

Analytical articles

 

Member Comments

211
9 December 2015
Aleksandr Dynkin

President of the IMEMO, RAS Full Member, Chairman of the RIAC Scientific Council, RIAC Member.

Here's the Playbook for Getting U.S.-Russian Cooperation Back On Track
150
21 March 2014
Aleksandr Dynkin

President of the IMEMO, RAS Full Member, Chairman of the RIAC Scientific Council, RIAC Member.

Could Russia and EU jointly rescue Ukraine?

Poll conducted

  1. Korean Peninsula Crisis Has no Military Solution. How Can It Be Solved?
    Demilitarization of the region based on Russia-China "Dual Freeze" proposal  
     36 (35%)
    Restoring multilateral negotiation process without any preliminary conditions  
     27 (26%)
    While the situation benefits Kim Jong-un's and Trump's domestic agenda, there will be no solution  
     22 (21%)
    Armed conflict still cannot be avoided  
     12 (12%)
    Stonger deterrence on behalf of the U.S. through modernization of military infrastructure in the region  
     4 (4%)
    Toughening economic sanctions against North Korea  
     2 (2%)
 
For business
For researchers
For students