Print Читать на русском
Rate this article
(votes: 1, rating: 5)
 (1 vote)
Share this article
Sergey Luzyanin

Director of RAS Institute for Far Eastern Studies, RIAC member

Zhao Huasheng

Professor and director of the Center for Russia and Central Asia Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai

RIAC, Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences and Institute of International Studies at Fudan University Report #39 / 2018

This report presents the results of the analysis of the state of Russia–China relations in 2017 and the first quarter of 2018. Leading Russian and Chinese experts identify the achievements in the key areas of two states’ interaction and study the prospects for bilateral cooperation in light of the conclusions of the 19th CPC Congress and the results of the Russian Presidential election. The authors assess the prospects of reinforcing Russia–China cooperation on pending issues of global and regional agenda, promoting trade, economic, financial and investment ties to a new level as well as expanding educational and cultural exchanges. The scholars also formulate specific recommendations aimed at promoting bilateral interaction.

RIAC, Institute of Far Eastern Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences and Institute of International Studies at Fudan University Report #39 / 2018

This report presents the results of the analysis of the state of Russia–China relations in 2017 and the first quarter of 2018.

Leading Russian and Chinese experts identify the achievements in the key areas of two states’ interaction and study the prospects for bilateral cooperation in light of the conclusions of the 19th CPC Congress and the results of the Russian Presidential election. The authors assess the prospects of reinforcing Russia–China cooperation on pending issues of global and regional agenda, promoting trade, economic, financial and investment ties to a new level as well as expanding educational and cultural exchanges. The scholars also formulate specific recommendations aimed at promoting bilateral interaction.

Editor-in-Chief:

I. Ivanov, RAS Corresponding Member, Dr. of History

Authors:

From Russia:

S. Luzyanin, Dr. of History (Head); A. Kortunov, Ph.D. in History; A. Karneev, Ph.D. in History; V. Petrovsky, Dr. of Political Science; V. Kashin, Ph.D. in Political Science; I. Denisov; R. Epikhina; Y. Kulintsev; R. Mamedov; K. Kuzmina.

From China:

Zhao Huasheng, Professor (Head); Liu Huaqin, Ph.D. in Economics; Shi Ze, Professor; Xing Guangcheng, Dr. of Law; Guo Shuqing, Professor, Dr. of History; Feng Yujun, Dr. of Law; Cai Cuihong, Professor, Ph.D. in International Relations; Zheng Jiyong, Ph.D. in International Relations.

Copy Editors:

I. Timofeev, Ph.D. in Political Science; T. Makhmutov, Ph.D. in Political Science; K. Kuzmina; A. Larionova; A. Teslya; M. Smekalova.

Russian–Chinese Dialogue: The 2018 Model, 2 Mb

(votes: 1, rating: 5)
 (1 vote)

Poll conducted

  1. Korean Peninsula Crisis Has no Military Solution. How Can It Be Solved?
    Demilitarization of the region based on Russia-China "Dual Freeze" proposal  
     36 (35%)
    Restoring multilateral negotiation process without any preliminary conditions  
     27 (26%)
    While the situation benefits Kim Jong-un's and Trump's domestic agenda, there will be no solution  
     22 (21%)
    Armed conflict still cannot be avoided  
     12 (12%)
    Stonger deterrence on behalf of the U.S. through modernization of military infrastructure in the region  
     4 (4%)
    Toughening economic sanctions against North Korea  
     2 (2%)
 
For business
For researchers
For students