Marko Martinovic's Blog

The hubris of the American empire in the geopolitical realist and eschatological civilizational Russian vision: The Ukrainian conflict in continuation of the Great Game (2015)

June 1, 2018
Print
Abstract



Since the breakup of Yugoslavia and the USSR, the "colour revolutions" and the "Arab Spring" might have contributed to trivialize the events of February 2014 in Kiev, Ukraine. It would nevertheless, be neglecting the importance of geopolitical factors involved in the Euromaidan and largely explaining the consequences of this popular revolt that led to a coup. This would also require disregarding history and the realist Russian security perception faced with the hubris of the American unilateralism in the pursuit of the "Great Game". In contrary, just by trying to get into Russian boots, we understand that the current war in Ukraine acquires an eschatological dimension for Russia which fears its disappearance as the hearth of a civilization. This surprisingly echoes the declaration of Mitterrand: "France does not know it, but we are at war with America, Yes, a permanent war, a vital war, an economic war, a war apparently without deaths. Yes, the American are very hard, they are voracious, they want undivided power over the world. It is an unknown war, a permanent war, without apparently death and yet a war to death" (Mitterrand, cited in Benamou, 1997). Finally, this brings us to conclude that the United States should change their behaviour because Russia constitutes more a potential ally than a threat for them.




Postgraduate Degree Dissertation

M.A. International Relations (Security)
POLSIS,School of Government & Society

University of Birmingham, UK
Author: Marko Alexandre Martinovic
Date: 17 September 2015



Full version in attached PDF file bellow


Share this article

Poll conducted

  1. Korean Peninsula Crisis Has no Military Solution. How Can It Be Solved?
    Demilitarization of the region based on Russia-China "Dual Freeze" proposal  
     36 (35%)
    Restoring multilateral negotiation process without any preliminary conditions  
     27 (26%)
    While the situation benefits Kim Jong-un's and Trump's domestic agenda, there will be no solution  
     22 (21%)
    Armed conflict still cannot be avoided  
     12 (12%)
    Stonger deterrence on behalf of the U.S. through modernization of military infrastructure in the region  
     4 (4%)
    Toughening economic sanctions against North Korea  
     2 (2%)
 
For business
For researchers
For students