Analytical articles
The true potential of Russia–Pakistan relations lies in their ability to adapt to changing geopolitical realities while maintaining a focus on shared interests
ShortThe process and regimes of arms control reduce the threat of war between participating countries. However, they cannot by themselves dictate their entire foreign policy, which is shaped by many other factors
ShortIn the 21st century, the whole idea of junior and senior partners looks outdated and even archaic. True international partnerships are based on mutual respect, empathy and a carefully calibrated balance of interests
ShortA BRICS interregional currency as a prerequisite for financial multipolarity
ShortAmerica will more-so have to adapt to the emerging world than to adapt the world to itself
ShortThe figure of the U.S. president is unlikely to play a big role in Russian-American relations
ShortUS-Chinese relations will most likely follow a course of controlled rivalry over the next four years
ShortMoscow’s policy of building transaction mechanisms independent of the Western financial infrastructure will reduce the ability of Western countries to use their financial capabilities for political purposes
ShortWhat problems does Turkey seek to solve by joining the group and why does BRICS need it?
ShortThe US “empire” always strikes back, or at least it will for as long as it can
ShortChina is more than willing to contribute to regional stability and peace
ShortWashington's desire to establish a dialog on arms control and risk reduction with Moscow and Beijing, albeit with each of them separately, looks very cynical
ShortPoll conducted
-
In your opinion, what are the US long-term goals for Russia?
U.S. wants to establish partnership relations with Russia on condition that it meets the U.S. requirements 33 (31%) U.S. wants to deter Russia’s military and political activity 30 (28%) U.S. wants to dissolve Russia 24 (22%) U.S. wants to establish alliance relations with Russia under the US conditions to rival China 21 (19%)