Thomas Frear's Blog

Томас Фриар

The study of International Relations has historically focused on the activities of large, powerful states, dismissing the smaller entities of the international system as unimportant or merely objects of policy for the larger entities. This truism extends especially to those entities that exist in an unrecognised or partially recognised limbo, neither a full part of the international system nor an ungoverned space. Yet in the post cold war world, following the dissolution of large multi-national states such as the USSR, these entities have begun to proliferate; either as a consequence of the drive for independent statehood by a small nation (Abkhazia, Northern Cyprus, Chechnya), an attempt at unification of an ethnic enclave with an external parent state (Nagorno-Karabakh, South Ossetia) or as a political expedient in response to adverse circumstance (Taiwan, Somaliland). This proliferation provides a significant challenge to an international system in which the primary participants are states, and to the institutions created to oversee their interaction. Unrecognised entities, existing outside of this framework, represent a threat to the universal principle of sovereignty, that one true institutionalised aspect of international relations. As such the study of these entities and their interaction with the world outside their borders is a study important for a systemic understanding of the post cold war world. This blog aims to provide an introduction to these entities and to address the complexities inherent in their policy making. Thomas Frear is a recent graduate of an MA in International Relations in Eurasia from the Higher School of Economics (Moscow) and an MA in International Relations from the University of Kent. Thomas is currently based in London.

Новые записи

Нет записей за это время. Попробуйте поискать за другой период или не используйте фильтр.

Прошедший опрос

  1. У проблемы Корейского полуострова нет военного решения. А какое есть?
    Восстановление многостороннего переговорного процесса без предварительных условий со всех сторон  
     147 (32%)
    Решения не будет, пока ситуация выгодна для внутренних повесток Ким Чен Ына и Дональда Трампа  
     146 (32%)
    Демилитаризация региона, основанная на российско-китайском плане «заморозки»  
     82 (18%)
    Без открытого военного конфликта все-таки не обойтись  
     50 (11%)
    Ужесточение экономических санкций в отношении КНДР  
     18 (4%)
    Усиление политики сдерживания со стороны США — модернизация военной инфраструктуры в регионе  
     14 (3%)
Бизнесу
Исследователям
Учащимся