It is difficult to talk about any specific guilt of the Chinese leadership for a pandemic in this light. Exactly the same blunder fluctuations with the introduction of draconian anti-epidemic measures due to a delay in the arrival of reinforced concrete scientific justifications, was repeated by all other large countries in the world ...
... complaining about the actions of the World Health Organisation (WHO) and decided to suspend its funding. What would you say about this?
Sergey Ryabkov:
For me the main thing is that these past months the WHO has been the centre of all information on the pandemic, a generator of recommendations and conceptual approaches, and a platform for analysing a complex of all data and producing rational recommendations. We can probably say that nothing is perfect under the sun and there is no limit to perfection ...
... rise worldwide.
A second conclusion is drawn on the basis of the so-called “minute-per-minute” chart of the programme entrusted to me: last Saturday the leaders of the viewing turned out to be a special report on the history of the fight against pandemics in 14
th
, 17
th
and 18
th
centuries (the only thing that actually worked back then was the quarantine, too) and a package about the conversion (or rather not so much of a conversion) of the OPEC + into an OPEC ++.
Of course, there is a still ...
... for benefit. And in both those cases, that may not fit the definition of terrorism. Still, ultimately I think that there is a possibility that terrorist groups may try to do something similar.
What should governments do to prevent this so-called “pandemic terrorism”?
There are really a couple of things. The first is to be very careful about monitoring indicators of intent. That means that the Russian, US and other governments around the world are carefully monitoring what we would call a chatter ...