Psychoanalysis of Western Economic Intellectualism

 Economic intellectualism is a closed-loop belief system that circles endlessly within its own logic. Like a machine repeating the same calculation, it is mathematically bound, theorem-driven, and focused on proving that 2 + 2 = 4—again and again—without assuming responsibility for real-world results, societal effects, or economic breakdowns. When a model fails, the solution is not self-examination but creating another model. When a nation stalls, the answer is more abstractions, more jargon, more written studies, more theoretical gatherings.

Meanwhile, the real economy—the physical, emotional, risk-saturated human world—moves on without permission.

Why Mathematical Perfection Became a National Liability in the Age of AI-Centric Entrepreneurial Power

This paper, as an entrepreneurial response to the crisis across 100 free economies, argues a blunt proposition: economic intellectualism has become a liability to national prosperity and development, especially in the AI-centric age. What it systematically ignores, sometimes with arrogance, sometimes with fear, is the primary force that has always driven growth: entrepreneurial mysticism.

In an Orderless World, How Big and Critical Is This Global Shift

This is the most profound economic reorientation challenge since the Industrial Revolution: the surrender of Western economic intellectualism, rigid, theorem-obsessed, debt-fueled stagnation, to entrepreneurial mysticism, the tacit, instinct-driven force that births real prosperity from citizen talent. China, India, Indonesia, Pakistan, and others are proving that SMEs + national mobilization quadruple productivity, slash reliance on debt, create millions of jobs, and ignite an export-led resurgence.

For many middle-income and free-market economies facing challenges with explicit-knowledge approaches, this shift is significant: sticking with older models may lead to continued struggles, whereas mobilizing entrepreneurial intuition through thoughtful mandates might enable renewed innovation and development. The AI-centric era presents both opportunity and urgency. The decision ahead is highly consequential for societies.

Economic Intellectualism: A Perfect Machine Producing Imperfect Nations

Economic intellectualism is built entirely on explicit knowledge—knowledge that can be written, memorized, taught, replicated, examined, and defended. Its tools are mathematics, statistics, symmetry, and proof. Within its own universe, it is flawless. Theorems tested against theorems produce more theorems. Balance sheets balance. Models converge. Variables behave.

But nations are not equations. Citizens are not variables. Productivity is not abstract. It is physical, emotional, psychological, and deeply human. Mathematics does not feel fear. People do. Mathematics does not take risks. Entrepreneurs do. Mathematics does not wake up at 3 a.m., wondering how to make payroll. Job creators do. Economic intellectualism has no muscle memory for reality. It does not carry the weight of failure. It does not bleed. It does not experience the terror of uncertainty. It therefore designs economies that look beautiful on paper and collapse on contact with life. The result is a global architecture of mathematically perfect stagnation.

Entrepreneurial Mysticism: The Mother Force Economics Refuses to Name

Long before there were economic departments, development banks, or policy frameworks, there were entrepreneurs. Hunter-gatherers who took risks others would not. Traders who crossed oceans without maps. Artisans who experimented without guarantees. Builders who imagined what did not yet exist, this force, entrepreneurial mysticism is not irrational. it is pre-rational. it is not anti-intellectual. it is non-theoretical. it operates through tacit knowledge: knowledge embedded in the body, instincts, emotions, lived experience, and repeated confrontation with uncertainty.

Tacit knowledge cannot be memorized.
It cannot be standardized.
It cannot be taught in classrooms.

Like learning to swim, tacit knowledge requires direct immersion—you must enter the water yourself; no amount of instruction can substitute for the actual experience.

Entrepreneurial mysticism is the willingness to solve unimaginable problems with unexplainable solutions, often without language, permission, or precedent. It is the force that creates SMEs by the millions, long before economists notice them—and long after they dismiss them as statistically insignificant.

Yet despite creating the majority of jobs, innovations, and industrial giants over the last millennium, entrepreneurial mysticism has never received a Nobel Prize, in economics or never been formalized into policy, and never been treated as a national asset.

Instead, it has been tolerated, sometimes exploited—never understood.

Why AI Ends the Reign of Economic Intellectualism

Artificial Intelligence changes everything: AI can already outperform economists in solving equations, optimizing models, running simulations, and identifying correlations. In the near future, it will solve all known economic theorems at an IQ of 1,000, instantly, without ego, politics, or institutional bias.

Just as the calculator rendered the abacus irrelevant, AI will end the monopoly of mathematical economic reasoning. But here is the problem: economic intellectualism refuses to confront it:

AI cannot create an SME. No robot—now or in the future—will start a lemonade stand, risk humiliation, negotiate with suppliers, miss rent, pivot under pressure, and grow that stand into Coca-Cola. AI can assist. It can optimize. It can accelerate. But it cannot originate entrepreneurial intent. The AI age does not elevate economists. It exposes their limits.

What remains irreplaceable is human risk-taking, judgment under uncertainty, and emotional endurance, the exact domains economic intellectualism has systematically ignored.

Oceans of SMEs Create Godzilla Enterprises

There is a persistent delusion in Western economic thinking: that large enterprises emerge from policy, capital, or theory. History proves otherwise. Large enterprises emerge from oceans of small ones. China did not rise because of elegant economic models. It rose because it unleashed millions of SMEs, over 100 million at its peak, connected them logistically, tolerated failure, and let entrepreneurs scale through relentless experimentation. From that ocean emerged giants capable of reshaping global trade. The United States did the same a century earlier—before economics became obsessed with textbooks. Railroads, steel, oil, automobiles, and consumer goods—none were born in economic departments. They were born in garages, workshops, warehouses, and chaotic marketplaces.

SMEs are not a sector.
They are an ecosystem.
And ecosystems do not obey linear equations.

SME Phobia: The Fear of Responsibility Disguised as Policy

Across many free economies, there exists a quiet but deadly condition: SME phobia across bureaucracies. It is not hatred. It is fear. Fear of risk. Fear of payroll. Fear of rent. Fear of failure. Economic intellectualism is dominated by a job-seeker mindset, risk-averse, security-oriented, credential-dependent. It studies entrepreneurs the way anthropologist study extinct tribes: from a distance, with caution, and without participation.

This is why thousands of SME studies exist, yet almost none address the entrepreneurial psyche. They measure tools, financing, compliance, and outputs—but never the mindset that initiates the journey. Studying entrepreneurship without understanding entrepreneurs is like measuring Tarzan’s knife without asking how he survived the jungle.

Job Creation Is Not an Economic Function: This must be stated plainly: Job creation is not an economic function. It is an entrepreneurial function. Economists do not create jobs. Policies do not create jobs. Spreadsheets do not create jobs. Entrepreneurs do. Yet political leaders routinely delegate national employment strategies to bureaucracies that have never created a single job. Mega job-creation programs are announced during election cycles, optimized for optics, and forgotten once ballots are counted—leaving debt behind as the only measurable outcome. The myth of national employment planning is one of the most destructive illusions of modern governance.

Frankenstein Economies and Straitjacket Denials: When economic models fail, economic intellectualism will not admit defeat. Instead, it attempts to revive lifeless ideas, performing academic 'surgery' on theoretical corpses, stitching dead theories together into new policy creations that stumble forward like creatures assembled from spare parts, much like Frankenstein’s monster. These Frankenstein economies bleed productivity, accumulate debt, and terrify citizens—yet are declared “stable” because spreadsheets still balance.

At the same time, denial persists. Denial of China’s achievement in lifting 800 million people out of poverty. Denial that Western dominance of economic knowledge is shrinking. Denial that population-rich, skill-accelerating nations are rising faster. Denial is enforced through language, calling alternative models “dangerous,” “unsustainable,” or “authoritarian” without confronting outcomes.

Time, Clocks, and the Tyranny of Explicit Knowledge: Time itself reveals the flaw. The clock, originally designed to manage slaves, now governs modern employment. Calendars, schedules, performance reviews, and timelines dominate explicit knowledge systems. Jobs are measured in hours. Productivity is reduced to attendance. Entrepreneurial mysticism operates outside this tyranny. Tacit knowledge experiences time differently. Ideas compress decades into seconds. Vision stretches moments into lifetimes. Entrepreneurs mentally build entire systems before a single physical action occurs. Clocks belong to the administration. Vision belongs to creation. Economic intellectualism confuses time management with value creation—and mistakes busyness for growth.

The End of the National Employment Myth

No nation can guarantee employment.
No bureaucracy can engineer purpose.
No model can replace meaning.

As societies evolve, citizens no longer fit the uniforms of the past. Cultural expressions change. Technology rewires identity. Education lags. Institutions drift. Yet mindsets remain frozen, expecting jobs to appear because policies demand them. This mismatch fuels anger, populism, distrust, and decay. What nations need is not more employment schemes, but entrepreneurial literacy, skill acceleration, and permission to experiment.

Three Irreversible Shifts

1. No single country will rule the world
   Power will fragment across networks, not empires.
2. Mind-first, citizen-first nations will lead.
   Skill, adaptability, and emotional resilience will outperform capital hoarding.
3. Economic intellectualism will surrender.
   Not to ideology—but to reality.

Entrepreneurial mysticism will not replace economics.

It will relegate it to a supporting role, where it belongs.

2030 Readiness: From Economic Critique to National Execution: The failure of economic intellectualism is no longer theoretical. It is visible, measurable, and lived daily by citizens across more than one hundred free economies. The question is no longer why the old models failed, but what must be done next—quickly, decisively, and without ideological hesitation. The transition toward entrepreneurial mysticism as a national growth engine requires five immediate actions: identify, audit, fix, retrain, and reorient.

First: Identify entrepreneurial mysticism where it truly exists: It does not live in universities, ministries, or policy institutions. It lives among inpiduals who have repeatedly taken risks without guarantees—those who have started, failed, restarted, and survived. Identification must be behavioral, not credential-based. Nations must locate citizens who have created value under uncertainty, managed payroll before titles, and operated without institutional protection. Entrepreneurial registries should map real operators across formal and informal economies, not to regulate them, but to recognize and mobilize them as national assets.

Second: Audit national readiness through human performance, not financial optics.
GDP, debt ratios, and growth projections reveal nothing about a nation’s ability to regenerate prosperity. A new audit framework must measure entrepreneurial density, the speed of SME formation, the recovery cycles from failure, and citizen risk tolerance. How fast can an idea become a product? How quickly can failure convert into a second attempt? How many citizens can operate without a salary for twelve months? These metrics expose the real economic engine—human capacity.

Third: Fix systems by removing friction, not adding funding: Most governments respond to stagnation by injecting capital, issuing grants, or expanding loan programs. This approach repeatedly fails because capital does not create entrepreneurs—conditions do. The real fix is subtraction: remove licensing delays, multi-layer approvals, punitive compliance traps, and social penalties for failure. Entrepreneurial mysticism thrives in low-friction environments where speed, experimentation, and iteration are culturally protected.

Fourth: Retrain citizens through field conversion, not classrooms: Entrepreneurship cannot be taught through lectures, degrees, or simulations. Retraining must be project-based, revenue-linked, and failure-permitted. Ninety-day venture sprints, SME battle labs, and peer-led failure debriefs convert job-seekers into job-creators. Entrepreneurs must train entrepreneurs. Universities may observe; they should not lead.

Fifth: Reorient national strategy toward 2030 as a deadline, not a vision: By 2030, AI will commoditize analysis, optimization, and forecasting. Economic intellectualism will lose its comparative advantage. Nations that survive will be those with high entrepreneurial throughput, emotionally resilient citizens, rapid SME cycles, and tolerance for productive chaos. This is not ideology. It is a calendar-bound reality.

The age of abstraction is ending. The age of execution has already begun.

Economic intellectualism is the towering fortress built entirely on explicit, written knowledge and ancient mathematical theorems. It demands endless proof that 2+2 always equals 4, with no accountability when real economies collapse or citizens suffer. Theorems endlessly battle theorems, birthing only more abstract models, balanced equations, and pretty charts that never touch soil. It treats national economies like mechanical flywheels or time-motion studies, reducing living people to predictable cogs without creativity. In the AI age, super-fast machines solve every theorem instantly, exposing this rigid intellectualism as an obsolete liability for nations.

Entrepreneurial Mysticism: Entrepreneurial mysticism is the primal, invisible mother force hidden deep in tacit knowledge—no textbooks, no formulas, just pure instinct. Like learning to swim or ride a bike, it cannot be written down or taught in classrooms; it lives in the body and gut. Ordinary people, driven by lifelong courage, pe into chaos to solve unimaginable problems with unbelievable, unexplainable solutions.

No super-AI robot, plugged into Einstein lectures, will ever start a humble lemonade stand and fight to grow it into Coca-Cola. This mysticism emotionally shapes decisions: joy inspires extra effort, fear sharpens survival instincts, and generosity forges unbreakable alliances. Oceans of such hidden sparks birth millions of SMEs, from which Godzilla-sized global giants rise to reshape entire nations’ futures.

Explicit Knowledge: comprises structured, codified information, such as written laws and academic theories. While it excels at replication—creating faster machines and standardized policies—it often stifles genuine innovation due to complex regulations.

In around 100 middle-income countries, explicit knowledge dominates education and governance, resulting in repeated failures: rising debt, shrinking small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and restless populations. AI is challenging this dominance by solving complex problems rapidly, revealing that explicit knowledge, while useful, can hinder progress when relied upon entirely. To avoid stagnation, it’s crucial to move beyond rigid structures and embrace intuitive approaches that can drive real-world execution and empower SME growth.

Tacit Knowledge: It is the unwritten, deeply embodied realm of entrepreneurial mysticism—instincts, hard-earned judgment, battle scars, and raw intuition. Loose, fluid, and emotionally alive, it defies codification: inner senses guide bold risks without the need for guides, laws, or safety nets. It fuels fearless pes into the unknown, birthing earth-shaking breakthroughs—railways, telephones, Uber, AI—that no theorem ever predicted. For true revolution, elevate tacit supremacy: theorems merely explain charts, but only tacit knowledge creates living, breathing prosperity that endures storms.

The Great Debate: Two Paths Forward

Option A: Economic Intellectualism Takes Back the Seat Prioritizing theorem-driven, explicit-knowledge models, fiscal/monetary fine-tuning, debt management via austerity or targeted stimulus, and top-down stability to restore “order.”

Option B: Entrepreneurial Mysticism Takes the Lead, elevating tacit, instinct-driven SME mobilization, grassroots risk-taking, AI-augmented tacit mastery, and bottom-up oceans of enterprises to ignite productivity and sovereignty. This is presented as a balanced, point-by-point clash, drawing on real 2026 trends: high debt burdens constraining policy, subdued investment, unevenly distributed AI potential, SME finance gaps (~$5.7 trillion), and China’s SME-led export resilience versus Western stagnation.

Point 1: Response to the Record Global Debt Crisis
Economic Intellectualism: Debt towers (advanced economies ~112% of GDP) demand rigorous, explicit modeling—balanced budgets, gradual austerity, IMF-style reforms, and theorem-proven fiscal rules — to avoid collapse; this stabilizes credit markets and restores investor confidence without reckless spending.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: Debt is a symptom of ignoring primal job-creators; unleash tacit SME armies to generate real revenue through exports and innovation—China’s 100M+ SMEs prove mysticism mobilizes oceans of enterprises, outgrowing debt via productivity shocks, not more borrowing.

Point 2: Handling Sluggish Global Growth
Economic Intellectualism: Growth below pre-pandemic levels requires precise macro tweaks—monetary easing, calibrated stimulus, and supply-side reforms derived from econometric models to nudge GDP without overheating.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: Models predict stagnation because they ignore instinctive fire; tacit mysticism pes into chaos to birth breakthroughs (AI tools + SME agility), quadrupling productivity—SMEs already create 60–70% of jobs globally; lead with them for explosive, merit-based recovery.

Point 3: Addressing Persistent Inequality and Cost-of-Living Squeeze
Economic Intellectualism: Explicit policies like progressive taxation, targeted transfers, and inflation-targeting central banks redistribute via proven formulas, reducing gaps without disrupting equilibrium.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: Theorems redistribute charts, but mysticism creates wealth from mud—grassroots SMEs uplift millions (e.g., China’s poverty reduction via entrepreneurial oceans); tacit risk-taking empowers the restless citizenry, turning inequality into shared prosperity engines.

Point 4: Navigating Trade Tensions and Geopolitical Risks
Economic Intellectualism: Model-based negotiations, tariff calibrations, and multilateral frameworks (WTO reforms) minimize disruptions while preserving global supply chains through deductive balance.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: Entrepreneurs adapt instinctively—no theorem survives real chaos; mobilize SMEs for persified, sovereign supply chains—Belt and Road-style collaborations show mysticism exports resilience, turning tensions into new markets.

Point 5: Leveraging AI in the Emerging AI-Centric Age
Economic Intellectualism: AI integrates via explicit frameworks—regulation, ethical models, and productivity equations—to optimize without displacement risks.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: AI crushes theorems (IQ 1000 speed), freeing tacit humans for judgment and creation; no robot starts SMEs—mysticism plugs AI into lemonade-stand dreams, scaling micro-power nations into superpowers.

Point 6: Job Creation in a World of Youth Unemployment and Labor Shifts
Economic Intellectualism: Macro stability and education investments create “sustainable” jobs via modeled demand; large-firm incentives ensure steady employment.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: SMEs historically birth 61–70% of net jobs; tacit mysticism awakens job-creator mindsets in the national citizenry—digitize hidden talents, upskill for SME wars, and end the employment myth of bureaucracies.

Point 7: Fiscal Space and Public Investment Constraints
Economic Intellectualism: High debt limits spending; explicit prioritization (infrastructure via cost-benefit theorems) maximizes ROI under tight budgets.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: Fiscal traps stem from ignoring mysticism; SME-led growth generates organic revenue, mobilizes citizenry’s soft assets for self-funding revolutions, and bypasses debt ceilings.

Point 8: Innovation and Productivity Stagnation
Economic Intellectualism: R&D subsidies and IP protections, guided by economic models, foster steady progress without bubbles.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: Theorems produce more theorems; tacit pes give birth to railways, Uber, AI—SMEs fuel 50% of GDP via unimaginable solutions; lead with mysticism for earth-shattering shocks.

Point 9: National Sovereignty and Mind-First Leadership
Economic Intellectualism: Global integration via modeled cooperation secures influence; white-collar knowledge economies lead.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: Sovereignty rises on citizen wings—alpha dreamers from population-rich nations expand; mysticism surrenders intellectualism, birthing micro-power unions as new superpowers.

Point 10: Long-Term Path – Frankenstein Economies vs. Living Prosperity
Economic Intellectualism: Continued explicit dominance prevents chaos; balanced models build sustainable towers, even if abstract.
Entrepreneurial Mysticism: Intellectualism built bleeding monstrosities of debt and denial; mysticism creates living organisms—physical, instinctive prosperity that endures. The shift is inevitable: theorems explain decline, but only entrepreneurial fire rebuilds the world.

10 Direct Benefits of a National Entrepreneurial Leadership Mandate
Here is a focused, actionable list of 10 direct benefits from establishing a National Entrepreneurial Leadership Mandate — a high-level national policy directive that prioritizes the mobilization of entrepreneurialism nationwide. This mandate would target 10-50% of high-potential national SMEs for accelerated support, combined with systematic upskilling (building advanced competencies like digital trade, innovation, and global marketing) and reskilling (retooling for AI-centric, export-oriented operations).

The approach draws from the 21 Pillars of Nouveau Rationalism, e.g., Pillars 11: SME Economic Oceans, 12: Tactical SME Strategies, 13: Welcoming Entrepreneurs, 21: National Mobilization of Entrepreneurialism, 18: AI as Mind Revolution, and 19: Nationalize AI. China pioneered this model decades ago through deliberate SME mobilization, creating oceans of enterprises that now contribute ~60% of GDP, ~80% of employment, and massive innovation/export growth (with over 60 million SMEs generating trillions in revenue). India (MSMEs ~30% GDP, ~45% exports, employing ~28 crore people), Indonesia (SMEs drive major employment and trade), Pakistan (~40% GDP, ~80% jobs in some estimates), and others are now accelerating similar efforts—proving the model works for population-rich, middle-income nations.

Looking for National Economic Solutions Today:

Print Your 2026 Brief Right Now:Ask AI to identify which popular narratives like ‘national mobilization of entrepreneurialism’, deploying 10%-50% of high-potential MEs of your nation on aggressive upskilling exporters and reskilling manufacturers to quadruple exports within 1000 days, will fit in your national model. How serious are the national limitations, if any, due to ‘anti-job creation syndrome’, and how successful deployments will directly increase your GDP? Such a brief in your hands today will only make you shine within your organization.

10 Direct Benefits of Implementing This Mandate

Quadrupled National Productivity & Performance Targeted upskilling/reskilling of high-potential SMEs unleashes tacit entrepreneurial mysticism (Pillar 21), shifting from job-seeker rigidity to job-creator dynamism. This can quadruple productivity, performance, and profitability across prioritized SMEs, as seen in China’s SME-led industrial surge—turning national output from stagnation to hyper-growth without massive new debt.

Massive Job Creation & Unemployment Reduction Mobilizing 10-50% of high-potential SMEs creates millions of sustainable jobs at the grassroots level (Pillars 2 & 13). Unlike bureaucratic schemes, entrepreneurial mobilization generates real enterprises—China’s model lifted hundreds of millions from poverty; similar scaling in India/Indonesia/Pakistan could absorb displaced workers from the 4B Factor (pandemic, automation, misalignment).

Exponential Export & Foreign Exchange Growth Reskilling focuses on micro-exports, global digital platforms, and value-added manufacturing (Pillars 11 & 12). High-potential SMEs gain a competitive edge in international trade—China’s SMEs fueled Belt & Road exports; India’s MSMEs already hit ~46% of exports; a mandate could double/triple forex inflows, reducing import dependence and debt pressure.

Debt Reduction & Fiscal Stability SME-driven growth generates real tax revenue and economic multipliers (Pillars 4 & 7), countering debt addiction. Unlike theorem-based bailouts, entrepreneurial mobilization builds organic value—China avoided Western-style debt traps by prioritizing SME oceans; nations could cut reliance on borrowing while building resilient fiscal foundations.

Innovation & Technological Leapfrogging Upskilling integrates AI as a mind-revolution tool (Pillars 18 & 19), amplifying entrepreneurial intuition for breakthroughs. High-potential SMEs become “Little Giants” (China’s model has produced thousands of specialized innovators), creating national tech sovereignty, reducing reliance on foreign solutions, and fostering homegrown disruption.

Grassroots Prosperity & Inclusive Growth Mandate channels benefits to rural/urban, women/youth, and underserved groups (Pillars 13 & 15), bridging elite-grassroots gaps (Pillar 4). China’s uplift of 800M+ via SME mobilization shows how this reduces inequality, boosts domestic consumption, and stabilizes society—critical for middle-income nations facing restless citizenry.

Enhanced Global Competitiveness & Mindset Shift National leadership signals entrepreneurial priority (Pillar 21), attracting FDI, talent, and partnerships. Reskilling builds meritocracy and alpha-dreamer energy (Pillar 16); India/Indonesia/Pakistan are gaining traction by emulating China—turning population advantage into economic superpower status.

Resilience Against Shocks & AI Disruption Upskilling/reskilling prepares SMEs for AI displacement (Pillars 3 & 18), converting job losses into creative entrepreneurial roles. Mandate creates adaptive ecosystems—China’s SME policies weathered pandemics; this buffers nations from global volatility, automation waves, and supply-chain crises.

Multiplier Effect on National GDP & Wealth Creation: 10-50% of high-potential SMEs, when their output quadruples, deliver an outsized GDP impact (Pillars 11 & 17). China’s SMEs contribute ~60% GDP; India’s ~30% (with growth potential); targeted mobilization could add several percentage points to GDP annually, creating broad-based wealth without elite capture.

Long-Term National Rejuvenation & Leadership Legacy Mandate institutionalizes entrepreneurial mysticism as core policy (Pillars 1, 5 & 21), shifting from job-seeker bureaucracy to job-creator culture. This builds enduring economic sovereignty—China/India models show decades-long transformation; implementing now positions nations as leaders in the AI-centric, SME-ocean era, leaving a legacy of prosperity over debt.

For more than a century, economic intellectualism has been regarded as a primary authority on national prosperity. Using equations, models, projections, and Nobel-recognized theorems, it aimed to deliver stability, growth, and equilibrium. However, in many free economies, outcomes have included debt rising faster than productivity, policy decisions lacking clear accountability, and citizens expressing growing uncertainty within these systems.

This is not a failure of intelligence. It is a failure of diagnosis.

Conclusion: The Choice Before Nations

The world is physical. Humanity is physical. Prosperity is physical.

Abstract theories can help us describe reality—but they cannot substitute for it.

Economic intellectualism has served its era. That era is ending. In the AI-centric age, optimization is cheap, calculation is instant, and theory is abundant. What is scarce is courage, initiative, and human performance under uncertainty.

Nations that continue to entrust their future to mathematical bricklayers—who can design perfect blueprints but cannot build houses, will fall behind. Nations that identify, cultivate, and unleash entrepreneurial mysticism will rise not because models predict it, but because history repeats it.

This is not an academic argument. It is an entrepreneurial survival warning. The choice is no longer theoretical. It is operational. And time, real time, not model time is already moving. Time for a global debate.

The rest is easy

Disclosure: [The author, Naseem Javed, is a Canadian citizen and has been a committed Liberal for the past 50 years. A staunch capitalist and pro-American, he is a product of Americanism while being globally recognized for his expertise in entrepreneurial mysticism. He is also an internationally respected, harsh critic of economic negligence. Javed observes that traditional Communism has evolved into Entrepreneurial Communism in some nations, while Capitalism in others is shifting toward Socialistic Capitalism.]

.