JVLV: The Muslimization of Europe? Reports from Germany

THE MUSLIM-IZATION OF EUROPE:  REPORTS FROM GERMANY By Jiri and Leni Friedman Valenta, 9-12-2015

What the German press is not reporting, but Middle East expert Jake Neuman is.

Jake Neuman,  who lives in Germany raises the question of whether there is a hidden side of the present invasion of Muslim immigrants not reported in the press.

"Dear Jiri, Last night near me a 24 year old woman was attacked and raped. An 89 year old was robbed and raped. Last week an 18 year old woman was raped by 2 Muslims and a 17 year old was raped and killed. German police are under reporting crimes by 100%.  What do they do with all the donated clothing. They dump it like garbage.   (He sent a photo which we could not copy.) 90% of these people are men ages 19 to 45.  They can now  afford 3 and 4 wives set up in different houses all paid for by stupid Germans.

Just before we received Jake's letter we posted this article:

 "JVLV:  We Must Prevent European Immigration catastrophe From Engulfing America!"

Americans are generous by nature.  It is also heartbreaking to see the suffering of human beings who are fleeing the Middle East, presumably in hopes of escaping war and oppression. However, before we open our arms to these immigrants, we must assess some troubling aspects of the European catastrophe.

Why are the Hungarians, particularly the outspoken Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, but also Slovaks, Czechs and Poles, who lived many years under Communism, much more skeptical about the real purpose of this immigration explosion threatening to engulf Europe?The answer lies in where they many of them are headed--- prosperous countries including  Germany, France, the U.K., Scandinavia –and here.  They want a higher standard of living than they’ve known.  Already, most of the immigrants headed to our own southern borders are not Mexicans.  Many come from the Middle East and Africa. 

We may find ourselves being asked to admit people who are very different from us in their lifestyles and attitudes. A  Czech cook, Milos Hlavacek, working for an immigration camp in Freyung Germany, has highlighted the problem, having gotten to know the Muslim residents over many months. He reveals that the lifestyle of the immigrants he encountered is not European; they do not clean either themselves (showers are available) or their lodgings, they throw furniture they don’t like out the window and steal from stores even though they and their children get sufficient euros for necessities besides free lodging and free food that adheres to dietary laws.  Nor are they all poor. Some have gold and many have I-phones and are contacting relatives to discuss future sponsorship. In his words, “Some are living better than German widows on small pensions.”

         Of course immigrants in other Western camps may not be faring that well.  Australia, in violation of international laws, ruthlessly stops   boatloads of immigrants headed its way.  Immigrants are retained at Australian detention centers like Nauru, where, despite laws that make it a crime to discuss camp conditions, employees have revealed abuses like the sexual assaults of children and drug trafficking in exchange for sex.

        The question is, what should America do?  Polls indicate that a majority of the American public presently support Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and other presidential candidates who favor mandatory deportation of illegal immigrants already here, and a path to citizenship for those arriving legally.  Our credo has long been to welcome immigrants who have generally contributed to our prosperity.

         Obviously, we need to control immigration because we are already staggering under a 19 trillion dollar debt and many of us are on food stamps. But accepting Muslim immigrants, despite our high ideals, also presents multiple challenges.  We all support the “peaceful Muslims,” but as analyst Jake Neuman has repeatedly explained,  actual tenets in the Koran and Sharia law, support the killing of infidels and other practices we find abhorrent. 

        We believe in freedom of worship, but if a religion practices or tolerates stoning adulterers to death, cutting off the hands of thieves, or killing women who marry outside the religion, we naturally must abridge that freedom.  Intrinsic to precepts of religious freedom is the toleration of other tolerant religions.  If a religion is intolerant, it must either reform, conform, or else not be permitted.  Since many Muslims would like to live under Sharia law, the crucial philosophical question for these Muslims is whose laws to obey if they conflict.

        For us, it’s no brainer.  How can Muslims assimilate into America if their religion denies equal rights to women and has a totally different concept of God than the rest of us – one that values martyrdom in return for a male heaven of perpetual fornication with virgins?  Consider that we are already experiencing attacks on the homeland from radicalized Muslim youth and this problem can only balloon as they are fruitful and multiply.  Indeed, it seems evident that, like the Australians, we must restrict immigration from Muslim countries even as we provide humanitarian aid to those in need.  Meanwhile, Muslims already here must pledge allegiance to U.S. law above Sharia law.

        In large part, the massive immigration challenge to Western Europe and surely coming to us is the result of President Obama’s failed foreign policies in Syria, Iran and Afghanistan and lawless executive orders mandating immigration, insecure borders and sanctuaries cities here.   A few years ago the president had the opportunity, having set a red line, to use force against inhuman   Syrian dictator Assad for use of chemical weapons against innocent civilians, and to engage in the pre-emptive destruction of ISIS.  Organizing a coalition of Arab allies led by our Special Forces and using ground air controllers, in combination with our air force was possible.  Obviating the need and logic for immigration, could have been achieved by resolving the Syrian civil war.  Thankfully, we have reversed the contemplated withdrawal from Afghanistan.

        In the forthcoming debate and rallies, the presidential candidates must address not only the catastrophic Iran nuclear deal, but also the equally catastrophic immigration policies of the present administration.  Walls are only part of the solution. Immigration policy must be changed along the lines proposed by Donald Trump.  He does need to flesh out the details.

          Our own reckoning is that the 2016 election, given the multiple crises we are facing, may determine   the survival of our nation as the indispensable power for world order.  Let us pray the electorate gets it right this time.  As Germany’s Otto Von Bismarck once put it, ‘There is a special Providence that watches over fools, drunkards and the United States of America.’’