JVLV: ELECTING A GENUINE, UNCORRUPTED PATRIOT IS WHAT MATTERS MOST! By Leni Friedman Valenta and Jiri Valenta

                         Unafraid, Bi-Partisan, Uphold U.S. and Freedom,

“Situation Serious: We lost the first engagement. Mission: Retake the Initiative!” So said General Colin Powell, NSA to Donald’s favorite president, Ronald Reagan, after his disastrous, first encounter with Mikhail Gorbachev at the 1987 Washington summit. Like Donald, Ronnie, did not take his opponent too seriously. Meanwhile, his adversary had studied for weeks. 

Same with Donald. He scowled, Hillary smiled. He lost his cool, she didn’t. During the first debate, and now approaching the second one , Hillary, veteran of many scandals and facing a deluge of Wiki-leaks exposing her power hungry deeds and disdain for our national security, has shifted to Nixonian classic tactics. She’s digging up any dirt she can throw to keep the spotlight on Donald. The beauty queen was the cheese in the last mousetrap. Then came Billy Bush -- first cousin to Jeb -- who recorded the lewd Trump tape a decade ago. The plot thickens. Trump’s Republicans foes are helping Hillary pile on. Other sex scandals are in the making to distract Americans from Hillary’s’s horrrendous misdeeds while flooding them with Donald peccadilloes.

Unsurprisingly the Billy Bush tape found its way from the Bushes to Hillary. After all Donald derailed crown prince Jeb. He also exposed “W” and his NSA, Condi Rice, as not protecting us from 9/11 and launching the 2003 Iraq War in spite of faulty and manipulated intelligence. Former first lady Barbara Bush, the brightest of all the Bushites, must have quickly recognized how American women and Republican nomenklatura would respond to a tape with Donald’s lewd language,

Richard Nixon: “Hillary Inspires Fear!”

More and more Hillary reminds us of Richard Nixon, who almost firebombed Brookings Institution in 1971 in his fruitless search for Vietnam papers shedding light on LBJ’s supposed efforts to derail his 1968 presidential candidacy. Then Nixon ordered the burglary of Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist and of the Democratic Party office in the Watergate Hotel. Watergate was born and the “gates” -- as in “Benghazi-gate discussed below --are now shorthand for high level presidential scandals of both parties. 

In the wake of the PC campaign against Donald, Hillary has crudely commented that Julian Assange of Wiki-leaks “should be droned.” No wonder that Nixon, the master of dirty tricks himself concluded “Hillary… inspires fear!” 

Unfortunately, Assange’s revelations are being ignored. Where is the outrage, for example, that Hillary was exposed as a rabid anti-Semite by prominent Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, who studied the Wiki-leaks, e-mail correspondence between Hillary and Sid Blumenthal, Sid is the father of Max Blumenthal, widely known as an infamous anti-Semite . The good rabbi opened our eyes to how Sid sent Max’s articles to Hillary and she was repeatedly applauding them and wanting copies. 

Hillary’s Temper Tantrums and War on Women

 Ed Klein, distinguished editor of the New York Times Magazine, and best selling writer of The Truth About Hillary, reported on both Hillary’s vulgar use of the vernacular and ill-suited temperament for office. “She had thrown a lamp at Bill calling him a stupid mother f------! At another time she shouted at a secret service officer,”Where is the miserable co--sucker!” 

The New York Post also commented on her temper tantrums and near melt down when Bernie posed a challenge to her 2016 nomination: “Hillary’s having screaming, child-like tantrums that have left staff members in tears and unable to work,” said a campaign aide. “She thought the nomination was hers for the asking, but her mounting problems have been getting to her and she’s become shrill and, at times, even violent.”

With the left wing media now making a teapot tempest over Donald’s locker room language a decade ago, Donald has acknowledged that coming from the entertainment industry he has been less than tactful at times with regard to women and regrets it. But Trump’s language regarding women is chump change compared to what Hillary has said and done in destroying the characters of numerous women who complained of Bubba’s hormones. 

With the help of diabolic Blumenthal, a/k/a “Sid Vicious” she developed different narratives and labels for destroying Bill’s female accusers. Monica Lewinsky? a “narcissistic looney tunes,” and a “stalker.” Gennifer Flowers? “Trailer trash,” and Paula Jones? “White Trash after cash.” Other of Hillary’s victims were “liars,”“sluts” and “bitches”.

Not just name-calling, either. Hillary is accused of actual harassment and intimidation by these women. Katherine Willey who has written extensively on Hillary’s war on women, has reported how detectives, undoubtedly sent by Hillary, came and threatened her with jail. Sally Purdue says Hillary’s Clinton machine threatened to physically harm her. There are a lot of things Hillary pretends to be but isn’t - a feminist is one of them. 

Hillary’s Foreign Policy with Russia: “Reset” and Uranium Deal.

Hillary has also attacked Trump about his possible business connections with Russia and has accused him of “admiring Putin.” Donald should explain that Putin is a strong and even brilliant leader. So was Stalin. That doesn’t mean he likes or admires Stalin or Putin personally -- or that he wants to be an authoritarian leader. And it doesn’t mean he can’t reach out to Putin as Reagan did with Gorbachev.  

Donald has had some prior business experience with Russia, and so has Hillary. But it is she who made a dazzling, strategic error in foreign policy. She engaged in a “reset” with Russia a year after his 2008 invasion of sovereign Georgia. She pushed a gimmicky red, “reset” button with then Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. You don’t forgive Russia for taking chunks out of another nation -- the provinces of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. You apply really tough sanctions. Otherwise you get another n -- and we did thanks to Obama’s weakness. In fact we got two of them in the Ukraine. 

Hillary Okay-ed the Sale of a Fifth of Our Uranium to Russia

Meanwhile, beginning in 2009, Bill Clinton was also helping an old billionaire friend with the sale of a Canadian uranium mining company to Russia with vast stakes in the American west. The deal had to be okay-ed at the highest level of the U.S. and Madame Secretary obliged. Russia thereby got a fifth of America’s uranium; 20% 

Of course State wasn’t the only agency that signed off under Obama -- who relishes leading from behind while following the doctrine of ‘strategic patience” vis-a-vis Russia. But in return for her signing off on the deal, Hillary got millions in donations to the Clinton Foundation and Bubba got a half million dollar speaker’s fee in Moscow. Whatever Donald’s faults, we are convinced patriotic Donald never would have signed off on a deal so disfavoring America.

Hillary’s War on Libya -- Lies, Deception and Catastrophe

Hillary is an unvarnished hawk who did not learn anything from the 2003 George W. Bush-Condi Rice Iraq war against dictator Saddam Hussein,. Evenn though that war resulted in quagmire and vast losses in human life and treasure, Hillary set about repeating the catastrophic Iraq scenario in Libya. She became the chief architect of a new war against yet another dictator, Moammar Gaddaf. In 2011 she convinced Obama and his National Security Council to support a NATO, “humanitarian” intervention in Libya, presumably because Gaddafi was about to “massacre “ his own people.

But Hillary’s Wiki-Leaks declassified e-mails to and from her chief, unofficial counselor on Libya, Sid Blumenthal, tell a different story. Yes, there was bloody civil war between Gaddafi’s forces and rebel forces. But there was no massacre by Gaddafi and no humanitarian intervention was warranted. There was no planned massacre by Gaddafi.

 The NATO intervention in which France took the lead, was for the purpose of regime change and killing Gaddafi. The French were in it because Gaddafi’s plans for a new currency backed by his gold reserves were a threat to the frank in Francophone Africa.

As Wiki-leak e-mails show, Hillary, with the help of Sid Blumenthal, began to acquire arms from a variety of dealers, and furnished them to the anti-Gaddafi rebels. It was, in fact, these Hillary-backed rebels who subsequently engaged in the massive killings of Gaddafi loyalists, including Black African foreign workers loyal to him. 

“We came, we saw and he died!” crowed Hillary, taking credit as good Sid advised, when the rebels finally accomplished their murderous mission. The problem was that the rebel’s she had helped to arm were al Qaida and other jihadists. With Gaddafi’s death, al Qaida hell broke loose and the huge migration to Europe from Libya began. Libya became a failed state like Iraq.

Was all this necessary? Gaddafi, a secular leader, had given up his own weapons of mass destruction and fighting the islamists. Lately, we learned he was ready to cease hostilities. As a global Indian peacemaker, Dr. Kilari Ananad Paul, recently reported, when he visited Gaddafi in August 2011, the dictator was even ready to hold democratic elections. But Hillary nixed the peace deal and chose war. Why? As Dr. Paul explained, 

“It’s well known in Libya that Gaddafi supported Obama over Clinton in the run up to the ‘08 elections, despite the Clinton team approaching Gaddafi’s son, Saif al-Gaddafi, and asking the family to invest in Hillary’s campaign and foundation, which they did not.”

So according to Dr. Paul, Hillary nixed the peace deal for revenge. Astounding but not unbelievable. Like Nixon before her, Hillary keeps an enemies list and the details involved in pursuing those she despises is truly impressive. Dr. Paul also believes the war offered a great opportunity for her to make money through arms dealing for her private hedge fund, the Clinton Foundation, with juicy speaker’s fees for Bill. As also revealed by Wiki-Leaks, Hillary’s true motives were oil, gold and money. There is no mention whatsoever of humanitarian concerns. 

The Truth About Benghazi You Never Knew

 This brings us to the tragedy of Benghzi-gate and the still unknown facts concerning the deaths of four Americans. The most cogent analysis of Hillary’s arms transfer to the Libyan rebels can be found in the writings of Claire Lopez-- a former CIA analyst. The gun running during the Libyan revolution, she tells us. was “directed by Hillary Clinton and Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was her official envoy to the Libyan Al Qaida.” 

As in Hillary’s earlier war on American women who objected to Bill’s hormonal escapades, Hillary’s “Rasputin,” Sid Blumenthal, was once again busy with dirty tricks. As his and Hillary’s e-mail correspondence demonstrates, one of the rumors he helped to spread was that Gaddafi, has adopted “a rape policy and has even distributed Viagra to his troops to rape rebel women.”

Another expert on fascinating tales, Hillary’s ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, took this fabrication to the Security Council. It helped convince the Russians not to vote against Hillary’s supposed “humanitarian” venture. 

“To avoid having the funds tracked back to the Obama administration,” writes Lopez, “the arms flow to Libya was financed through the United Arab Emirates, while Qatar served as the logistical and shipping hub.”With Hillary’s, aid, Bill Clinton has been a frequent visitor to the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. The trips often deal with money. Bill collected $500,000 for a single speech he delivered in Abu Dhabi in 2011 from the the UAE’s royal family. 

After Libya, Hillary Moves on Syria

Lopez continues, “In 2012, the gun-running into Libya turned around and began to flow outward, from Benghazi to the AQ [Al Qaida]-and-MB-[Muslim Brotherhood] dominated rebels] in Syria. This time, it was the CIA Base of Operations [the CIA Annex in Benghazi] that was in charge of collecting up and shipping out SAMS [surface-to-air missiles] from Libya on Libyan ships to Turkey for overland delivery to a variety of jihadist militias, some of whose members later coalesced into groups like Jabhat al-Nusra and ISIS [also known as IS].”

 Did Hillary Send Sarin Gas to Syria?  

We cannot fail, however, to notice also the narrative of yet another reputable analyst and Pulitzer Prize winning reporter Seymour Hersh. In his article, “The Red Line and the Rat Line,” Hersh, after conducting many interviews concluded that Mrs. Clinton’s policies not only furnished arms to the anti-Assad rebels through what he called the Rat Line, but most likely also provided them Libyan sarin gas. Hersh’s conclusions need further examination and exposure. 

If that’s true, Clinton has failed another test in yet another area -- our policies with Russia in the Middle East. The work of Hersh reveals that Obama backed away from his Red Line in Syria not out of cowardice but because military intelligence determined the sarin tested as coming from Libya via and Hersh believes Hillary must have at least known. It may have been the rebels who used the sarin on civilians.

Did We Almost Go to War Against Syria and Russia in 2013 Based on Faulty Intelligence?

Thus, Donald must concentrate on Hillary’s national security misdeeds more than on Bill’s women’s issues. He must question the source and perpetrators of the August 21 2013 sarin attack on innocent Syrian civilians, including children. Who were the real perpetrators? In early September that year we almost went to war with Assad and his Russian backers over Syria.

One of these writers does recall a prominent Russian scholar telling him, ”Jiri are you blind believing that cunning Assad would unleash such an attack as the U,N, inspectors were visiting Damascus.”

So our government lied to us again, didn’t it? More evidence must be assembled, yet we have concluded that Mrs. Clinton is directly responsible for the war in Libya that turned it into a failed, al Qaida-ridden state. Moreover, she is responsible for worsening the relations with Russia. Her “reset” was gone and ever since then, even more than Obama, she has not been trusted at all in the Kremlin. We believe the Russians hacked her insecure e-mail and knew of her correspondence with Sid on Libya.

Moreover, as we showed in our article, “Why Putin Wants Syria,”former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, no dove on Russia, concluded that the turning point in Russia’s policy on Syria came after Hillary’s war in Libya brought the country into chaos. “Convinced they had been tricked” [at the U.N.] into buying a “humanitarian” intervention in Libya, the Russians would subsequently block any such future resolutions including against President Bashar al Assad in Syria.” 

 The wars in Libya and Syria were fought not in the service of our vital national interests, but for reasons related to personal interests, power, greed, and revenge. We still have to question what Hillary doing supporting and arming islamist groups in two countries.What was the proposed regime change in Syria supposed to look like?

We are aware of the many negative features of Donald Trump. None of them, however, come close to the the poor judgment, the greed, the congenital lying, the disregard for our vital, national interests and the personal callousness of Hillary Clinton. The four Americans who died in Benghazi could have been saved had she heeded their cries for more security and not gone to war in Libya and Syria. 

The Third Debate and Casting Ballots on November 8th.

Before casting ballots, the American people should envision how our country will look if Hillary is elected. The FBI and Justice Departments may well become arms of the Democratic Party and of Hillary’s will. The huge influx of illegal Latinos over our southern borders, and the thousands of immigrants from Sharia law countries that Hillary intends to import, will bring dramatic demographic transformation of our country, resulting in a sea change in politics benefiting primarily the Democratic Party. 

As in Germany, huge problems will arise with immigrants from Sharia law countries, who, as Europe shows us, will not integrate. Bear in mind that the jihadist paradigm of conquest is not through air and sea attacks but infiltration of the target country at every level until the web is drawn and the spider pounces. 

The Court will be packed with Hillary’s “Progressives,” leading to the gradual transformation of the second amendment and the institutionalization of the progressives’s program: a large increase in the minimum wage, free college tuition and other social issues for which we have no money. Such programs can bring a catastrophic deepening of our present unsustainable insolvency. Think Greece or Puerto Rico together with failed Obamacare.

The 2016 election is not an ordinary one where it doesn’t matter much which side wins. In the past the republic would survive either way. This time, however, we would be electing the most corrupt person ever to run for the highest political office, a person who does not even qualify to bear security clearance. How could we punish low level officials who disregard clearance if Hillary gets away with it. We would be anointing someone who already believes she is above the law. We would be making her inviolable.

If Hillary is elected, Political Correctness will dominate political discourse and will be used to turn our educational establishment into havens of anti-Americanism. Promoters of disrespect for our national anthem will be national heroes. Our police and armed forces will be vilified. Our internet will be censored and our great nation will not recover from Hillary’s Milhouse inferno, with perpetual lawsuits and her continual stonewalling as the country descends into chaos. In spite of all the latest accusations and Donald’s peccadilloes, The election of Donald J. Trump is mandatory!

 

Playwright and former Democratic Party official Leni Friedman Valenta is the CEO of the Institute of Post Communist Studies and Terrorism, editor of its website, jvlv.net, and author of articles in scholarly journals and newspapers at home an abroad. Published author Dr. Jiri Valenta is a Council on Foreign Relations member and recipient of the Jan Masaryk medal from the Czech Minister of Foreign Affairs, "for his contribution in preserving and promoting relations between the Czech Republic and the United States of America," A former U.S. Naval PG School faculty member, he is recipient of several distinguished fellowships; Brookings, Rockefeller, Wilson Center, CFR, Peace Institute, National Endowment for the Humanities, Fullbright, and Kiel, Uppsala and Colegio de Mexico Universities. The Valentas blogs also appear on the Wall of the Council on Foreign Relations and at the Russian International Affairs Council [RIAC], the principle think tank of Russia's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. They have never been censored.