Print Читать на русском
Rate this article
(votes: 5, rating: 3.4)
 (5 votes)
Share this article
Wolfgang Ischinger

Ambassador (rtd), President, Munich Security Conference Foundation; and former State Secretary, German Federal Foreign Office, Germany

Igor Ivanov

President of the Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC), Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (1998–2004)

Sam Nunn

Co-Chair, Nuclear Threat Initiative; and former U.S. Senator, United States

Desmond Browne

Vice Chair, Nuclear Threat Initiative; Chair of the Board of Trustees and Directors of the European Leadership Network; and former Secretary of State for Defence, United Kingdom

Ernest J. Moniz

Co-Chair and CEO, Nuclear Threat Initiative; and former U.S. Secretary of Energy, United States

Reducing and eliminating nuclear risks that could lead to catastrophic consequences is a common interest for all nations and an enduring responsibility of the nuclear weapon states.  The ongoing conflict in Ukraine elevates such risks dramatically.  The firefight at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine was the latest reminder of how nuclear catastrophe can quickly rise to the surface in the “fog of war.”  The leaders of China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States together affirmed in January that “a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.”  The first and most essential step toward reducing the risks of a consequential accident, mistake, or miscalculation is a ceasefire to end the unacceptable and unjustifiable loss of human lives, including innocent civilians.

Dialogue, diplomacy and negotiations are the only acceptable route to resolving the conflict in a way that can stand the test of time.  We must return to diplomacy and dialogue to ensure current disputes on core issues are negotiated and not fought.  We welcome the first attempts of Russia and Ukraine to start such negotiations.  We also welcome the efforts of world leaders aimed at finding a political settlement.  We highlight the importance of keeping diplomatic and military communications channels open at all times.  We stand ready to provide civil-society support to leaders moving the world in a safer and more hopeful direction.

Reducing and eliminating nuclear risks that could lead to catastrophic consequences is a common interest for all nations and an enduring responsibility of the nuclear weapon states.  The ongoing conflict in Ukraine elevates such risks dramatically.  The firefight at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine was the latest reminder of how nuclear catastrophe can quickly rise to the surface in the “fog of war.”  The leaders of China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States together affirmed in January that “a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought.”  The first and most essential step toward reducing the risks of a consequential accident, mistake, or miscalculation is a ceasefire to end the unacceptable and unjustifiable loss of human lives, including innocent civilians.

Dialogue, diplomacy and negotiations are the only acceptable route to resolving the conflict in a way that can stand the test of time.  We must return to diplomacy and dialogue to ensure current disputes on core issues are negotiated and not fought.  We welcome the first attempts of Russia and Ukraine to start such negotiations.  We also welcome the efforts of world leaders aimed at finding a political settlement.  We highlight the importance of keeping diplomatic and military communications channels open at all times.  We stand ready to provide civil-society support to leaders moving the world in a safer and more hopeful direction.

Signatories

Euro-Atlantic Security Leadership Group (EASLG) Co-Conveners

Lord Des Browne, Vice Chair, Nuclear Threat Initiative; Chair of the Board of Trustees and Directors of the European Leadership Network; and former Secretary of State for Defence, United Kingdom

Wolfgang Ischinger, Ambassador (rtd)President, Munich Security Conference Foundation; and former State Secretary, German Federal Foreign Office, Germany

Professor Igor Ivanov, President of the Russian International Affairs Council (RIAC); and former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Russia

Ernest J. Moniz, Co-Chair and CEO, Nuclear Threat Initiative; and former U.S. Secretary of Energy, United States

Sam Nunn Co-Chair, Nuclear Threat Initiative; and former U.S. Senator, United States

CONTACT: Cathy Gwin (Nuclear Threat Initiative), gwin@nti.org, 202-270-5942

Rate this article
(votes: 5, rating: 3.4)
 (5 votes)
Share this article

Poll conducted

  1. In your opinion, what are the US long-term goals for Russia?
    U.S. wants to establish partnership relations with Russia on condition that it meets the U.S. requirements  
     33 (31%)
    U.S. wants to deter Russia’s military and political activity  
     30 (28%)
    U.S. wants to dissolve Russia  
     24 (22%)
    U.S. wants to establish alliance relations with Russia under the US conditions to rival China  
     21 (19%)
For business
For researchers
For students